知识产权侵权获益赔偿的立法模式的选择——以现行法为分析对象  

Research on the Choice of Legislative Model of Disgorgement of Infringement of Intellectual Property

作　　者：孙良国[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期859-864,共6页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(10CFX044)

摘　　要：著作权法、商标法、专利法均明确规定了侵权获益赔偿。通说认为,获益赔偿只是损害赔偿的一种计算方式。实质上获益赔偿与补偿性的损害赔偿理念不同,其还有效保护权利、剥夺不当得利、威慑未来侵权行为等功能而非仅仅是填补损害,具有独立地位。就获益赔偿,我国知识产权法有补充式和选择式两种立法模式,前一模式认为获益赔偿是损害赔偿的替代性计算方式,后一模式赋予受害人可选择主张损害赔偿或获益赔偿。国际上的通行做法大都以选择式立法模式为主。选择式立法模式在权利保护和行为威慑上具有明显优势而且毋庸采取推定的立法技术,应为我国知识产权立法较为科学和理想的立法模式。Copyright Law,Trademark Law and Patent Law all regulate the system of disgorgement.Regular opinion thinks that disgorgement is only one kind of measure of compensation.In essence,disgorgement is different from the notion of compensation for damages,which serves the functions of protecting private rights,preventing unjust enrichment,deterring the potential tort,and thus has an independent role.As for disgorgement,current law has two models：supplementary and selective,the former regards that disgorgement is substitute measure of damages,while the latter regards that the victims should select to execute disgorgement or damages.International custom is to choose the selective model which has evident advances over supplementary model on protecting rights and deterring tort and exclude the legislative technique of presumption,so selective model should be preferred in the legislation of intellectual property.

关 键 词：损害赔偿 获益赔偿 立法模式 知识产权侵权 

分 类 号：DF523[政治法律—民商法学]