检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马建平[1]
出 处:《国际经贸探索》2011年第12期34-39,47,共7页International Economics and Trade Research
基 金:国家社科青年基金项目(11CJL053)
摘 要:文章基于WTO环境议题谈判清单评估我国环境货物的贸易竞争力,从整体而言,我国环境货物的贸易竞争力偏弱,多数税号环境产品靠数量优势弥补价格劣势才取得价值优势。其原因主要是:WTO环境议题谈判清单对我国不利;环境技术较发达国家落后;我国长期普遍性陷于恶劣贸易条件中。文章最后提出国际贸易谈判、环境技术研发、扭转贸易条件、竞争力提升策略和原则等政策建议。Based on the WTO Environment Negotiation List, the paper assesses the trade competitiveness of China's environmental goods. Generally speaking, China's environmental goods are weak in their trade competitiveness, and most of them obtain their value advantage by using volume advantage to offset price disadvantage. The main reasons for this situation are: the present WTO Environment Negotiation List is unfavorable to China; China is more backward in environmental technology than developed countries; China's exports have fallen into bad terms of trade for a long time. Finally, the paper proposes some suggestions such as improving international trade negotiations, enhancing R&D in environmental technology, improving terms of trade and strategies of competitiveness, etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.39