现代资产阶级经济学经济危机理论批判  

A Critique upon the Theory of Economic Crisis in Contemporary Bourgeois Economics

作　　者：丁堡骏[1] 赵羽[2] 高冠中[2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林财经大学马克思主义经济学研究中心,长春130117 [2]吉林财经大学经济学院,长春130117

出　　处：《当代经济研究》2011年第12期1-6,93,共6页Contemporary Economic Research

摘　　要：凯恩斯的经济危机理论有其合理的成分,但其中的错误也是显而易见的。凯恩斯对萨伊定律的批判,只不过是在重复马克思对萨伊定律方法论的批判。如果我们暂时不去追究凯恩斯是否对马克思的抄袭,而单就否定萨伊定律这一角度来看,我们不能说马克思批判了萨伊定律,而凯恩斯就没有批判萨伊定律。但是,凯恩斯承袭了斯密教条,因而不可能科学地说明资本主义经济的总量关系。凯恩斯将一条曲线辩护性地描述为独立的总需求曲线和总供给曲线,并杜撰了三大心理规律用以说明资本主义有效需求不足以及由此造成失业和经济危机,所有这些都是不科学的。凯恩斯既没有找到资本主义经济危机的病因,也没有理性地开出救治资本主义的良方。Though Keynes' theory of economic crisis has its own rationality, there are obvious mistakes in it.Keynes' criticism upon Say's Law was the simple repetition of Marx's critique on the methodology of the Law. If we temporarily put aside whether Keynes was a plagiarist and focus solely on their denials of Say's Law, it is difficult to assert that Marx criticized Say's Law and Keynes did not. However,Keynes followed Adam Smith's dogmatism, so it was impossible for him to clarify the aggregate relations of capitalist economy. Defensively, Keynes described a single curve as the total demand curve and the aggregate supply curve, and also coined three psychological disciplines to prove the effective demand of capitalism was insufficient, thus causing unemployment and economic crisis. All these are unscientific. Keynes not only failed to locate the root of capitalist economic crisis, but also gave no solution.

关 键 词：经济危机 斯密教条 萨伊定律 有效需求不足 

分 类 号：F014.82[经济管理—政治经济学]