检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩道瑞[1,2] 曹广民[1] 郭小伟[1,2] 张法伟[1] 李以康[1] 林丽[1] 李婧[1,2] 唐艳鸿 古松[1,4]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院西北高原生物研究所,西宁810001 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100039 [3]日本国立环境研究所 [4]南开大学生命科学学院,天津300071
出 处:《生态学报》2011年第24期7408-7417,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目(30970520);国家自然科学基金项目(31070433;30970520);中日合作项目(2010DFA31290)
摘 要:为了揭示青藏高原高寒草甸生态系统植被变化对碳储量的影响,以原生矮嵩草草甸、退化草甸、人工草地以及农田为研究对象,对比分析了该4种不同土地格局下生态系统的有机碳现状。以原生矮嵩草草甸土壤碳储量为基准对不同类型高寒生态系统的碳增汇潜力进行了估算。结果表明:不同类型生态系统的碳储量和碳增汇潜力有很大差异,在0—40cm土层中,(1)原生草甸碳储量最高,达到17098 g C/m2,退化草甸、人工草地和农田的有机碳汇增加潜力分别为:5637、3823、1567 g C/m2。(2)对于退化草甸和人工草地,土壤有机碳含量和密度明显低于原生草甸和农田。(3)地下生物量碳储量主要集中在0—20cm,且原生草甸地下生物量的碳储量比其他3个植被类型高3.6—5倍。总体上,青藏高原草地生态系统存在巨大的碳增汇潜力。To evaluate the potential effects of vegetation change on soil carbon storage on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.We examined the soil organic carbon content of natural alpine meadow,degraded meadow,artificial pasture and farmland,and estimated the potential of carbon sequestration of the latter three types based on former natural alpine meadow.The results showed that the four vegetation types have a great difference in potential of carbon storage of 0—40 cm soil layer:(1) the carbon storage in natural alpine meadow was the highest with 17098 g C/m2,and were 5637,3823 and 1567 g C/m2 for degraded meadow,artificial pasture and farmland,respectively;(2) soil organic carbon content and density in degraded meadow and artificial pasture were significant lower than those in natural meadow and farmland;(3) root carbon storage mainly concentrated in the 0—20 cm topsoil,and the natural alpine meadow was 3.6—5 times higher than other three vegetation types.The results suggested that,there is a huge potential of carbon sink in alpine ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15