山区某部队山勤与后勤人员身心健康状况的调查研究  

Comparison of Physical and Mental Health of Support Crew and Montanic Crew by Cornell Medical Index Health Questionnaire

作　　者：许长涛[1] 李为民[1] 郑方[1] 戴新[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军第309医院肝胆外科,北京100091

出　　处：《航空航天医学杂志》2011年第12期1420-1421,共2页Journal of Aerospace medicine

摘　　要：目的:探讨某常驻边远山区部队官兵身心健康的现状,为制定针对官兵的身心健康防治措施提供依据。方法:采用康奈尔健康问卷(CMI)对388名山勤和后勤人员进行调查,用总分法与精神症状评分法两种方法计分并进行数据统计。结果:CMI低得分(总分0～14分),后勤组(96.45%)高于山勤组(88.45%),P<0.05;有躯体和精神障碍者(CMI总分≥30分,MR分≥10),后勤组5例(2.58%)低于山勤组18例(9.28%),P<0.05;躯体症状阳性者(AL分≥15),后勤组6例(3.09%),山勤组5例(2.58%),P>0.05,无显著差别。有精神障碍者(MR分≥10),后勤组10例(5.16%),明显低于山勤组28例(14.43%),P<0.01。分析各项阳性因子显示,精神健康方面问题的阳性回答指数多于身体症状的阳性回答指数,其中焦虑、紧张和抑郁等因子相关项目位于前三位。结论:山区官兵的心理健康问题应给予关注,需要科学地做好心理疏导工作。Objective： To study the status of physical and mental health of the officers and soldiers working in mountain area, provide reference for the improvement of physical and mental health among them. Methods：388 officers and soldiers were investigated by Cornell medical Index Health Questionnaire and the results were compared. Results：The low scored （ 0 - 14 ） total scores of Gs （support crew group ）were higher than Gm （montanic crew group） （P 〈 0. 05 ） ; The high scored total scores of Gs were lower than Gm （ P 〈 0. 05 ） ; The A ~ L scores of Gs were no more than Gm （ P 〉 0. 05） and the M - R scores of Gs were lower than Gin. Factor analysis showed that the mental health question was more serious than that of physical health, and main factors contributing to high M - R scores were anxiety, intension and depression. Conclusions： More attention about mental health should be taken to the army crews working in the mountain area, and effective psychological counseling should be adopted.

关 键 词：康奈尔健康问卷 身心健康 现况调查 

分 类 号：R824[医药卫生—临床医学]