检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟大兴[1,2] 杨忠芳[1] 柳青青[1] 侯青叶[1] 夏学齐[1] 余涛[1] 袁国礼[1] 冯海艳[1]
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院,北京100083 [2]浙江省地质调查院,浙江杭州311203
出 处:《地学前缘》2011年第6期169-181,共13页Earth Science Frontiers
基 金:国土资源部公益性行业科研专项(200911020);中国地质调查局地质调查工作项目(1212011087125)
摘 要:岩石风化过程中所产生的碳汇是全球碳循环的重要组成部分,该领域受到研究全球变化科学家们的普遍关注。文中通过对鄱阳湖流域河水系统的样品采集和化学成分分析,研究了河水化学成分来源及流域岩石风化所产生的碳汇效应。以大气降水、蒸发岩、硅酸岩和碳酸盐岩为4个端员,计算出它们对河水中溶解质的贡献率分别为10.4%、21.9%、30.0%和37.8%。修水、赣江、抚河、信江和饶河各流域的化学风化速率分别为27.22、50.50、70.30、64.62和63.94t.km-2.a-1,剥蚀率为11.34、21.04、29.29、26.92和26.64mm.ka-1。采用两种模型对流域内化学风化作用CO2消耗量进行计算:其一是根据离子来源分析所得的数据,求得鄱阳湖、修水、赣江、抚河、信江和饶河流域CO2消耗量为:74.39、4.92、41.06、4.49、4.85和4.09×109 mol.a-1,硅酸岩风化贡献率分别占34.3%、76.6%、28.9%、60.4%、58.8%和32.8%;其二是利用GEM-CO2模型计算出各流域CO2消耗量分别为45.08、4.23、23.26、3.14、6.76和3.94×109 mol.a-1。对比两种模型所得数据,认为鄱阳湖流域风化CO2消耗量应为(4.5~7.4)×1010 mol.a-1。Carbon sink produced during rock weathering is an important part of global carbon cycle. Therefore, more and more attention has been paid to this field by the scientists who focus on the global warming. In this work, the source of ion of the rivers and carbon sink produced by rock weathering in Poyang Lake drainage basin are studied based on the systematic sample collection and chemical composition analysis of river water samples from this area. Taking precipitation, evaporation rock, silicate rock and carbonate rock as four end-member components, we have calculated their contribution rates to the total dissolved mass(TDS) of Poyang Lake water system, which are 10.4%, 21.9%, 30.0% and 37.8% respectively. The chemical weathering rates of the basin of Xiushui River, Ganjiang River, Fuhe River, Xinjiang River and Raohe River are 27.22, 50. 50, 70.30, 64. 62 and 63. 94 t · km^-2 . a^-1, respectively, while the erosion rates in these areas are 11.34, 21.04, 29. 29, 26.92 and 26. 64 mm · ka^-1. Two models were used to calculate the quantity of CO2 consumption during chemical weathering in the drainage area. One method is based on the result of ionic source analysis. In the basin of Poyang Lake, Xiushui, Ganjiang River, Xinjiang River and Raohe River, the CO2 consumptions are 74.39, 4.92, 41.06, 4. 49, 4.85, 4. 09×10^9 · mol · a^-1 , and the contribution of silicate weathering rates are 34. 3%, 76.6%, 28.9%, 60.4%, 58.8% and 32. 8%. The other method is using GEM-CO2 model to calculate chemical weathering rate in drainage areas respectively. The CO2 consumption are 45. 08, 4. 23, 23. 26, 3.14, 6. 76 and 3. 94×10^9 · mol · a^-1. Compared the data from the two methods, the results of the CO2 consumption are considered between 4. 5×10^10 · mol · a^-1 and 7. 4×10^10· mol · a^-1.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117