检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾荣娣[1] 周林辉[1] 吴琳[1] 汪华君[1] 徐遥[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属医院药剂科,江苏镇江212001
出 处:《抗感染药学》2011年第4期275-279,共5页Anti-infection Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较干预前后5种Ⅰ类切口手术预防性应用抗菌药物的合理性,考察干预措施的实施效果,促进临床合理用药。方法:选取实施干预措施前的2009年1—3月及干预后的2011年1—3月Ⅰ类切口手术预防使用抗菌药物的应用情况,并进行合理性分析。结果:干预后抗菌药物的费用和使用率明显下降,但仍存在高应用率、使用时间长等问题。结论:经比较,采取的干预措施是有效的、可行的。Objective: To compare the rationality of prophylactic use of antibiotics in 5 kinds of type I incision operations before and after intervention, to evaluate the effect of intervention measures and to promote rational administration. Methods: The cases of type I incision operations with implementation before intervention measures from 1 to 3 in 2009 and implementation after intervention measures from 1 to 3 in 2011 were collected and its rationality was ana-lyzed. Results: The cost and the rate of utilization of antibiotics decreased significantly after intervention, but still had problems such as high utilization rate, long using, etc. Conelution:By comparison, the intervention measures are effective and feasible.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229