政府治理的工具基础:西方政策工具理论的知识学诠释  

The Instrument Foundation of the Governing: Knowledge-based Interpretation of the Western Policy Instrument Theories

作　　者：孙志建[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院

出　　处：《公共行政评论》2011年第3期67-103,180-181,共37页Journal of Public Administration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"建设服务型政府与完善公共服务体系研究"(07AZZ010)

摘　　要："政策工具"的理论认知的薄弱会极大限制政府治理的思路与绩效。国际学界已就政策工具进行了跨学科、多视角的研究。但我国内地学界对这些理论成果的系统性引介仍属凤毛麟角。以知识学诠释为进路,综合运用系谱学与类型学,可以较为系统地展现政策工具研究的理论图景。按照系谱分析逻辑,对政策工具的概念与知识谱系(功能论、资源论和策略论)予以梳理。继而,依照类型学逻辑,对政策工具研究中并存甚至是竞争性的阐释视角、学派以及政策工具(及其评估标准)的类型进行考察。在此基础上,对政府治理实践分别从目的理性、工具理性、程序理性和评价理性等层面进行反思性阐释。As experiences show us,the poor knowledge of the'policy instruments'will largely limits the choosing of methods,also,limits the performance of Governing. The western scholars have done a lot of outstanding research on this topic Interdisciplinarily with Multiple perspectives. However,the systematic literature review of these studies in China's Mainland is still insufficient. In order to provide a more systematic theoretical picture of policy instruments studies,in this paper a knowledge-based Interpretation approach will be employed,which emphasizes the synthesized use of genealogy and typology. According to the logic of genealogy,the concept and theoretical pedigree of policy instrument will presented from three dimensions ( the functional approach,the resouce approach and the tactic or strategy approach) ; Then,according to the logic of typology, the theoretical relationship of coexistent or even competitive research perspective,theoretical school of policy tools studies,the taxonomies of policy instruments as well as their valuation criteria and so on will be traced out comparatively. Based on this knowledge-based Interpretation of policy instruments theories,the governing practice will be reflectively commented on from four kinds of perspective respectively.

关 键 词：公共政策工具化 政策工具 政府治理实践 知识学诠释 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]