检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐剑鸥[1] 顾则娟[2] 陈丽[2] 方小萍[2] 张镇静[2] 王荣[2] 林征[2] 许勤[2]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属医院护理部,南京市212000 [2]南京医科大学第一附属医院
出 处:《中国护理管理》2011年第12期32-35,共4页Chinese Nursing Management
基 金:南京市科协软科学基金资助项目(宁科协[2009]27)
摘 要:目的:编制住院患者满意和体验监测量表,并对其进行信度、效度检验,为研究住院患者对护理工作满意度提供测评工具。方法:参考《护理结局分类》中患者满意度结局,自行设计患者满意度调查表,采用专家咨询法进行内容效度检验,向江苏省某"三甲"医院舒心病房患者发放调查表209份,进行内部一致性信度、结构效度检验。结果:调查表总的Cronbach’sα系数为0.95,内容效度指数为0.76。采用主成分分析法提取了5个公因子,累积贡献率为75.516%。经最大正交旋转方法提取因子,共提取出因子37个。结论:初步形成了信度、效度较好的住院患者满意和体验监测量表,为评价临床护理工作质量提供依据。Objective: To provide evaluation tools for inpatient satisfaction with nursing care, this research developed inpatient satisfaction and experience monitoring scale and tested its reliability and validity. Methods: We developed inpatient satisfaction and experience monitoring scale based on patient satisfaction outcomes in Nursing Outcomes Classification. Five experts were consulted to test the content validity, and 212 patients in a general hospital of Jiangsu province were surveyed to test its internal consistency and structure validation. Results: The reliability with Cronbach's α index for internal consistency was 0.95 and the content validity index was 0.76. Five common factors were derived by factor analysis and the explained variance for factor analysis was 75.516%. By applying the maximum orthogonal rotation factor extraction, a total of 37 factors were extracted. Conclusion: The scale has good reliability and validity, which would be helpful for further nursing care evaluation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28