论西方联盟各国对欧安会的态度及其意义  

The Attitudes of the Member States of Western Alliance to CSCE and Their Meanings

作　　者：申红果[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《历史教学（下半月）》2011年第12期52-57,共6页History Teaching

基　　金：武汉大学人文基础自主科研项目<缓和时期的英苏关系研究(1960年代后期至1970年代前期)>的阶段性成果

摘　　要：欧洲安全与合作会议是冷战进入缓和阶段时苏联对外政策的重要内容之一。面对苏联以及华约组织近二十年的欧安会倡议和宣传攻势,西方联盟从最初的拒绝到最终的接受。但是,西方联盟各国对欧安会的态度却千差万别,美国完全漠视这次会议,法国和西德怀着谨慎乐观的态度,英国对欧安会"不想要、但却不可避免",北约较小国家则有的主张强硬对待苏联、有的由于积极看待欧安会而被称为"潮湿的前线"。这些态度差异不仅表明西方联盟各国对欧安会的预期不同,也反映出它们在冷战进程中的立场和目标相差较大,显示了它们各自的基本外交特征,更影响到冷战结束后欧安组织的机制发展。因此,西方联盟各国较深刻地影响了欧洲的国际关系进程。Conference on European Security and Cooperation （CSCE） was one of the most important Soviet foreign policies during the d 6 tente era. Facing nearly twenty-year＇s proposals from Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact Organization, the Western Alliance＇s position transferred from reject to acceptance. But the attitudes of the Western Countries varied. The America treated such a pan-Europe conference with totally indifference, France and West Germany were hopeful to some extend and prudent at the same time, Britain＇s attitude was ＇not wanted, but unavoidable＇. As to the smaller members of NATO, some were uncompromising to Soviet Union, while the others were called ＇the wet front＇ because of their believing in CSCE. These varieties of attitudes reflected not only their disparate prospects, but also that there were big gaps among their basic foreign positions and aims when they were in cold war. This deeply affected the mechanism of Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe （OSCE）. Accordingly the members of the Western Alliance heavily influenced the process of international relations in Europe.

关 键 词：西方联盟 欧安会 缓和 

分 类 号：D75[政治法律—政治学]