检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西中医学院第一附属医院,广西南宁530023
出 处:《辽宁中医药大学学报》2012年第1期60-62,共3页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:广西科技厅自然基金资助项目(2011GXNSFA0186301)
摘 要:目的:探讨经筋疗法配合腰椎定点斜板法治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LIDH)的临床疗效。方法:将符合标准的180例患者随机分为治疗组90例和对照组90例,治疗组采用经筋疗法配合腰椎定点斜板法手法治疗,每日治疗1次,每次40min,5次为1个疗程,疗程间休息2天,治疗3个疗程后,并与对照组(传统推拿手法治疗)作疗效比较。结果:治疗组治愈30例,显效42例,有效12例,无效6例,治愈率33.33%,总有效率93.33%;对照组治愈9例,显效30例,有效36例,无效15例,治愈率10%,总有效率83.33%。两组总有效率比较有显著性差异,P<0.05。结论:经筋疗法配合腰椎定点斜板法手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效优于传统的推拿手法。Objective : To study the clinical observation of muscle region therapy plus fixed ramp method of lumbar in lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Method : 180 patients were randomly divided into treatment group 90 cases and Control group 90 cases, The patients in the treatment group received muscle region therapy plus fixed ramp method of lumbar. Compared with control group (traditional of manipulation ), one time daily, 40min each time one course of treatment consisted of 5 times, between two courses rest for 2 days, after 3 cycles of treatment. Result : Treatment group : convalescence 30 cases, excellence 42 cases, effective 12 cases, no effect 6 cases, the cure rate 33.33%, the total effective rate was 93.33%; Control group:convalescence 9 cases, excellence 30 cases, effective 36 cases, no effect 15 cases, the cure rate 10%, the total effective rate was 83.33%. The difference between two groups was significant, P〈0.05. Conclusion : Muscle region therapy plus Fixed ramp method of lumbar in Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation were superior to those in the traditional of manipulation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117