检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张子华
机构地区:[1]江苏省吴江市中医院普外科,江苏吴江215221
出 处:《实用临床医药杂志》2011年第24期83-84,90,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice
基 金:中国高校医学期刊临床专项资金(41120015)
摘 要:目的观察低位小切口甲状腺次全切除术的临床疗效。方法选择近3年内于本院就诊的行低位小切口甲状腺次全切除术的患者28例(小切口手术组),以及既往行传统甲状腺次全切除术的患者26例(传统手术组)作为研究对象,比较2组的临床疗效。结果 2组手术均获成功,小切口手术组在切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、对邻近神经以及器官的影响等方面明显优于传统手术组,而在并发症方面无显著差异。结论低位小切口甲状腺次全切除术疗效优于传统手术,且未发现严重并发症,安全有效,值得推广。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of the lower small incision subtotal thyroidectomy. Methods This study selected 28 patients who received the lower small incision subtotal thyroidectomy (small incision surgery group) and 26 patients who received the previous subtotal thyroidectomy for conventional surgery(conventional surgery group) during the last three years in our hospital. The clinical effects were observed and compared. Results The two groups were both successful. The incision le, ngth, operative time, blood loss, the impact of adjacent nerves and organs of the small incision surgery group were obviously better than those of the conventional surgery group. There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups. Con- clusion The lower small incision subtotal thyroidectomy is more effective than the conventional surgery. No serious complications have been found. It is safe, effective and worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40