中国古代疑案处理的启示  

An Inspiration About Disputed Cases in Ancient China

作　　者：吴春雷[1] 杜文雅[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学法学院,天津300134

出　　处：《天津大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第1期47-51,共5页Journal of Tianjin University：Social Sciences

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划基金资助项目(Tjfx08-047)

摘　　要：在中国古代社会对疑案进行处理的过程中,逐渐形成了疑则从无、疑则从轻、疑则从议等法律原则,这些原则在相关的司法实践中发挥了积极的作用。从事实认定和法律适用的角度选择了相关案例进行了实证分析。相形之下,在我国现行法律中却存在着对疑案处理的法律原则规定的过于简单,司法实践中疑案最终导致错案等问题。完善疑案处理的法律原则以及相关配套法律规定成为减少错案之必然趋势。In ancient China, during the procedure of dealing with the disputed cases, it gradually formed the legal principles of yi ze tong wu （it was disputed, then no doubt）, yi ze eong qing （it was disputed, then＇extenuating crime）, yi ze cong yi （it was disputed, then discussed） , and so on. These principles played positive roles in the judicial practice. A substantiation analysis has been made from the perspective of fact finding and the legal application. In contrast, there are many defects existing in the legal provisions and judicial practice of our country. For instance, the principle Of dealing with the disputed cases is too simple and disputed cases eventually become wrong judgments. It is an inevitable trend to consummate the principle of dealing with the disputed cases and the related regulations so that the wrong judgments could be reduced.

关 键 词：疑案 法律原则 法律适用 司法实践 

分 类 号：D909.92[政治法律—法学理论]