恶意欠薪罪若干问题探究  

On Several Problems in the Crime of Malicious Wage

作　　者：姜涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《法学论坛》2012年第1期79-86,共8页Legal Forum

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年项目<劳动法治视域下的劳动刑法制度研究>(09YJC820046)研究成果之一

摘　　要：把《刑法修正案(八)》第41条新增设的罪名定位为恶意欠薪罪,不仅更为形象、生动与简洁,更加符合本罪的犯罪构成,而且还能够全面反映本罪的本质属性。恶意欠薪罪的现有立法规定尚有不明确之处或根本性缺陷,应予以解释或改进。其中,应把本罪的主观方面解释为"恶意",把本罪的客观方面限定为"情节犯",以合理划定本罪的犯罪圈。同时,还应舍弃客观的处罚条件,而采用一种二元化犯罪模式,以有效遏制恶意欠薪行为。The crime new added by article 41 of Amendment of Criminal Law （8） should be named the Crime of malicious wage, which is not only more image, vivid and concise, and in line with the crime constitution, but also able to comprehensively reflect the essential attribute of this crime. As far as current legislation of the crime of malicious wage is concerned, there are some un- defined places and fundamental flaws, so it should be interpreted or improved effectively. Among them, the subjective aspect of the crime of malicious wage should be interpreted as ＂malicious＂, the objective aspect of the crime of malicious wage should be limited to ＂circumstance crime＂, so as to delimit its crime circle reasonably. Meanwhile, they still should abandon objective punishment condition, instead adopt dualization crime pattern, so as to contain the behavior of malicious wage effectively.

关 键 词：恶意欠薪罪 情节犯 二元化犯罪模式 《刑法修正案(八)》 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]