论我国刑罚理论研究中的四个误区——刑罚目的一元论之提出  

On the Four Misunderstandings in the Research of Punishment Theory in China

作　　者：王刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《法学论坛》2012年第1期116-121,共6页Legal Forum

基　　金：皮勇教授主持的教育部专题项目<我国量刑规范化改革基本理论与方法>(09YJCA820058);湖北省检察院重点项目<量刑规范化与量刑建议的基本理论>(HJ2010A10)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：我国刑罚理论研究中存在四个误区:混淆了刑法目的与刑罚目的;对刑罚目的的含义理解错误;把一般预防当作刑罚目的;把报应当作刑罚目的。通过对这四个误区的厘清,可以得出以下结论:刑法目的与刑罚目的是两个不同的概念;刑罚目的,是指国家通过适用和执行刑罚所期望达到的目标;一般预防是刑法目的,不是刑罚目的;报应是刑罚的本质,不是刑罚目的;刑罚的目的是特殊预防。Four misunderstandings exists in the research of punishment theory in China, they are confusing the purpose of criminal law and the purpose of punishment; misunderstanding the concept of the purpose of criminal law; treating the general prevention as the purpose of punishment and treating retribution as the purpose of punishment. Through the clarification of these four misun- derstandings can we draw the following conclusions ： the purpose of punishment and the purpose of criminal law are two different concepts ; the purpose of punishment is the objective of the application and enforcement of punishment by States; general prevention is the purpose of criminal law and not the purpose of punishment; retribution is the essence of punishment and not the purpose of punishment; the purpose of punishment is special prevention.

关 键 词：刑法目的 刑罚目的 一般预防 特殊预防 报应 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]