“历史民族志”与“历史的民族志”——民族志实践中的历史之纬  

Ethnography of History and Historical Ethnography:the Historical Dimension in the Ethnographical Practice

作　　者：陈静[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学人类学研究所,上海200444

出　　处：《东方论坛（青岛大学学报）》2011年第5期8-12,26,共6页Eastern Forum（JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY）

摘　　要：作为新兴的跨学科合作平台,历史人类学的理论与方法已渐趋成熟,其依托民族志报告的文本书写,包括两种类型":历史民族志"和"历史的民族志",二者的内涵与外延呈现不同的研究取向与价值。此二种写作方式,将历时性与共时性作为交叉的基轴统一纳入文本写作之中,将"过去"与"当下"融入整体的历史予以建构。但"历史民族志"将时间空间化、历史场域化,在历史的时间维度上做田野行走;而"历史的民族志",更注重将时间维度嵌入空间的延展之中,在当下的田野中把握历史脉搏。Historical anthropology has now become the new platform of interdisciplinary cooperation with the development of its theory and methods in recent years. Ethnography texts as the main representation of historical anthropology include two kinds of text： ethnography of history and historical ethnography. Their distinctions on notional connotation extension present different research approaches and values. They all use the diaehronic and synchronic as the basic shafts in the coordinate systems of text writing. And they all construct the past and present into the total history context. Through the spatialization of time and the field of the history, the ethnography of history focuses on the time dimension of history.

关 键 词：历史民族志 历史的民族志 过去与当下 历史维度 

分 类 号：K062[历史地理—历史学]