单一抑或多元——控制量刑自由裁量权的路径选择及体系构建  

Single Or Plural:the Path Choice and System Construction of Controlling the Sentencing Discretion

作　　者：陈晨[1] 刘砺兵 

机构地区：[1]东莞理工学院政法学院,广东东莞523808 [2]北京市朝阳区人民法院,北京100026

出　　处：《福建行政学院学报》2011年第6期65-71,共7页Journal of Fujian Administration Institute

摘　　要：刑事审判中如何有效规制量刑的自由裁量权,使其在追求刑罚个人化的同时仍然实现量刑的规范化,从而避免随意和不公,这是一个长期备受关注的问题。应该综合运用事前的规则控制、事中的程序控制以及事后的监督控制等手段,通过路径选择多元化、控制机制综合化的措施在正确的方向上继续深入推行量刑规范化工作,给被告人、被害人和社会提供一种更高质量的、更为个性化的正义。It has long been a major concern on how to control the sentencing discretion to balance the individuality and normalization and to eliminate injustice in criminal justice. It should use the beforehand rule controls, concurrent procedural controls and supervisions after the event and other methods, through plurality of route choice, the tantalization of control mechanism to promote the normalization of measurement of penalty in the right way to provide a higher quality and individualized justice for defendants, victims and society.

关 键 词：量刑 自由裁量权 路径选择 体系构建 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]