检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]装备指挥技术学院装备采办系,北京101416 [2]总装备部防化军代局,北京101004
出 处:《装备指挥技术学院学报》2011年第6期45-48,共4页Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology
基 金:部委级资助项目
摘 要:目前装备采购纠纷处理制度单一,已经不能适应纠纷解决的现实需要,面对日益增加的装备采购纠纷解决和权益救济的需求,创建装备采购诉讼制度显得尤为必要。尽快引入诉讼制度,可以权威地确认军方和承制单位的权利和义务,顺利化解装备采购分歧和争议,准确判定过错和责任,有效保证装备采购合同的高效履行和采购目标的顺利实现。分析了装备采购诉讼制度建设必要性,论证提出了装备采购诉讼的性质、法院选择、诉讼主体等实现路径。At present, the system of dispute resolution of equipment acquisition is simple. It has been unable to meet the practical needs of dispute resolution. Facing the increasing interest of dispute resolution and relief needs, the creation of litigation system is very necessary. Being introduced litigation system as soon as possible, can confirm the equipment contractor's right and duty authoritatively, resolute the equipment contractor's difference and disputes smoothly, judge the mistake and responsibility accurately, ensure performing contract efficiently and the realization of the goal. It analyzes the needs of establishment of litigation system of equipment acquisition, puts forward the realizedpath of the nature of litigation, the selection of court, parties of litigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117