检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱士江[1] 王忠波[1] 张忠学[1] 杜平[1]
机构地区:[1]东北农业大学水利与建筑学院,哈尔滨150030
出 处:《灌溉排水学报》2011年第6期97-99,共3页Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
基 金:黑龙江省科技攻关计划项目(GA09B105-1);国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BADB3B04)
摘 要:在黑龙江水稻灌溉试验中心进行水稻覆膜灌溉试验,研究了不同灌溉模式下,覆膜对水稻耗水量及水分生产效率的影响。结果表明,覆膜淹灌处理水稻耗水量比常规淹灌减少7.35%,覆膜控灌耗水量比常规控灌减少3.77%,覆膜间歇灌溉耗水量比常规间歇灌溉减少10.00%;覆膜淹灌处理水分生产效率较之常规淹灌提高32.45%,覆膜控灌处理水分生产效率较之常规控灌处理提高14.62%,覆膜间歇灌溉处理水分生产效率较之常规间歇灌溉处理水分生产效率提高13.59%。Effects of different film irrigation modes on rice consumption and water use efficiency was studied at GGSY. The results shows that, water consumption of film flood irrigation is less 7.35% than of flood irrigation, water consumption of film control irrigation is less 3.77% than of control irrigation, wa- ter consumption of film intermittent irrigation is less 10.00 % than of intermittent irrigation;water use efficiency of film flood irrigation is higher 32.45% than of flood irrigation, water use efficiency of film control irrigation is higher 14.62% than of control irrigation, water use efficiency of film intermittent irrigation is higher 13.59 % than of intermittent irrigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171