检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴媛[1] 匡桂芳[1] 夏颖[1] 解金娜 衡中玉
机构地区:[1]山东省青岛市妇女儿童医疗保健中心心理科,山东青岛市266011
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2011年第12期1170-1172,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基 金:青岛市科学技术局基金项目(08-2-1-6-nsh)
摘 要:目的探讨伴与不伴注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的抽动障碍(TD)患儿的主观生活质量与家庭环境特征。方法采用儿少主观生活质量问卷(ISLQ)和家庭环境量表中文版(FES-CV)分别对60例TD伴ADHD患儿(观察组)和60例TD不伴ADHD患儿(对照组)的生活质量和家庭环境两个方面进行问卷评估。结果观察组生活质量量表中同伴交往、学校生活、自我认知、抑郁体验、总体满意度得分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组家庭环境中的知识性、亲密度、组织性得分低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论伴有ADHD的TD患儿主观生活质量更低,家庭环境更差。Objective To explore the characteristics of subjective quality of life and family environment in children with tic disorder(TD) combined with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder(ADHD).Methods The Inventory of Subjective Life Quality(ISLQ) for Child and Adolescent and Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version(FES-CV) were used to assess the subjective quality of life and family environment in 60 children with TD combined with ADHD(observation group) and 60 children with TD not combined with ADHD(control group).Results The scores in peer interaction,school life,self-cognition,depression experience,overall satisfaction of the observation group were lower than the control group(P0.05) in ISLQ;the scores in intellectual-cultural orientation,cohesion and organization of the observation group were lower than the control group(P0.05) in FES-CV.Conclusion Children with TD combined with ADHD had low subjective quality of life and poor family environment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229