检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊国星[1] 徐文磊[2] 孟月[3] 胡珊珊[3] 孙知寒[1] 赵悌尊[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学公共卫生与家庭医学学院康复医学教研室,北京市100069 [2]人力资源和社会保障部工伤保险司,北京市100716 [3]首都医科大学公共卫生与家庭医学学院
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2011年第12期1193-1195,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目资助“残疾人工作疲劳度及职业康复干预比较研究”(09yjczh085)
摘 要:目的调查残疾人及非残疾人工作疲劳感,了解残疾人的工作抗压能力,为我国残疾人就业政策的制定及其职业康复提供依据。方法采用疲劳影响量表(FIS)随机对东中西3省各1个公司的每个车间及岗位的280名员工(包括残疾人220名,非残疾人60名)进行调查。结果残疾人的总体工作疲劳度与非残疾人比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在认知、身体、社会心理疲劳3个维度上也是如此。进一步对FIS量表的40个条目比较后发现,工作的残疾人在社会心理功能层面的疲劳有4个条目较非残疾人表现得更明显(P<0.05)。结论残疾人具有不低于非残疾人的工作抗压能力,完全可以胜任工作,残疾人及其家属、雇主都应该对其就业更有信心,国家政策应该提供更加强有力的保障。Objective To investigate the status of work fatigue of the disabled and the healthy so that we get to know their employment quality and compressive strength,and then provide the theory basis for the national policy formulation and vocational rehabilitation.Methods We randomly investigated 280 employees(220 disabled,60 healthy people) in 3 companies from 3 provinces with Fatigue Impact Scale(FIS).Results There was no statistically significant difference between disabled and healthy people about work fatigue,and also that of 3 domains including psycho-social,cognitive and physical activity.After comparison of 40 items on FIS,the disabled had higher fatigue than that of the healthy in 4 items which belonged to psycho-social domain(P0.05).Conclusion Disabled people are no less than healthy people in compression capability and working capability.They should believe in themselves,and their family and the employees should have more confidence about their work capability than before.Government should provide some support with them on job retention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30