检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘霞[1] 伍建平[2] 宋维明[1] 张大红[1] 张岩[1]
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学,北京100083 [2]中国农业大学经济管理学院,北京100083
出 处:《林业经济》2011年第12期42-47,共6页Forestry Economics
摘 要:文章从共管直接推动力的来源、共管中经济收益的分享以及主要参与者的角度.将目前我国自然保护区社区共管的实践模式分为5种,并对每一种模式都选取了一个典型案例进行了深入的分析。指出不同模式基本都是集权式管理的模式,社区及居民在共管中并没有真正的平等。大都存在权属冲突,基本没有共管的资源,普遍参与性不够,参与人数少,分权不够,民间组织普遍没有得到重视,社区能力建设没有得到足够的重视。但是每个案例也都有其突出的优点可供借鉴。From the views of motivation mechanism, benefit share, and stakeholders, this paper classifies the models of community co-management in China's nature reserve as 5 types. For each model, a typical case-study is selected for further analysis. Analysis shows, the current practice of community co-management in China's nature reserve belongs to the models of improving livelihood with the support from the natural conservation zones or international organizations. Those models have some common issues: basically all models are centralized authority management; property conflicts exist between stakeholders; residents in the community have no co-management resources; participation is not enough; lack of decentralization; non-government organizations are not well devel- oped; community capacity building has not been paid sufficient attention. Each model has some advantages to be learned from.
分 类 号:X36[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222