检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王秀娟[1] 刘希双[2] 张黎明[3] 王光兰[2] 毛涛[2] 刘华[2]
机构地区:[1]青岛大学医学院附属医院消化内科,山东青岛266003 [2]青岛大学医学院附属医院内镜中心,山东青岛266003 [3]山东枣庄市立医院消化内科,山东枣庄277102
出 处:《中国药房》2012年第4期312-314,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较单剂量磷酸钠盐口服液与复方聚乙二醇电解质散在患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的有效性、耐受性及不良反应发生情况。方法:拟行结肠镜检查的470例患者随机均分为2组,各235例。A组服用磷酸钠盐口服液,B组服用聚乙二醇电解质散,观察2种药物清洁肠道的效果、口感、不良反应及患者耐受情况。结果:A组服药到首次排便时间、服药到最后一次排便时间均较B组短,排便次数明显少于B组(P<0.01);2组的肠道清洁有效率和口感评价比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组的大量气泡率高于B组,不良反应发生率低于B组,且患者的耐受性优于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:单剂量磷酸钠盐肠道清洁效果好,肠道准备时间短,耐受性好,不良反应少。OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, tolerability and adverse drug reaction between a single dose of sodium phosphate oral solution and Compound polyethylene glycol-electrolyte powder in bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METH- ODS: 470 patients undergoing colonscopy were randomized into 2 groups with 235 cases in each group. Group A received oral sodi- um phosphate, while group 13 received polyethylene glycol-electrolyte powder for the bowel preparation. Effect of bowel cleansing, taste, adverse drug reactions and tolerance were observed. RESULTS: The average time from taking medicine to either the first def- ecation or last defecation of group A were shorter than those of group B, the defecation number of group A was also less than that of group B (P〈0.01). Group A was similar to group B both in effective rate of bowel cleansing and taste (P〉0.05). Group A was higher than group B in the rate of large number of bubbles, lower in the rate of adverse drug reactions, and better than in the toler- ance (P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of sodium phosphate has good quality of bowel cleansing. It also has the benefits of less preparation time, better tolerance and less adverse drug reactions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.49.6