民国初期内藤湖南的“支那论”辨析  

Konan Naito's "On Shina" during the Early Republic Period

作　　者：杨栋梁[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学世界近现代史研究中心

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第1期1-10,共10页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究重大攻关项目(06JZD0023)

摘　　要：民国初期,堪称日本"支那学"代表的内藤湖南发表了大量涉华言论,"民族分裂"、"国际管理"、"放弃国防"以及由"异族刺激"、"文化中心移动"、"经济开发"等论点支撑的日本对华使命论,构成了其"支那论"的核心框架。对中国的蔑视自不待言,整体上低估中华民族的能力和潜力、为日本等列强的殖民政策张目,是内藤"支那论"的显著特点和致命缺陷。泰斗级"汉学家"堕落为煽动对华扩张的"国策学者",是内藤等战前日本知识分子的悲哀。Konan Naito as one of the representatives of Japan＇s ＂Shina Studies＂ during the early Republic period, published a large number of books and articles related to China, such as ＂Ethnic Separatism＂, ＂International Management＂, ＂Giving up the Defense,＂ and ＂Cuhural Center Mobile＂, ＂Economic Development＂ as the basic points of Japan＇ s mission for China, as the core framework of his theory of ＂On Shina＂. His theory had many salient features and fatal flaws that to contempt for China, and to underestimate thoroughly the potential ability of the Chinese people, and to serve for the Japan and the other powers＂ colonial policies. That the eminent ＂sinologists＂ just like Konan Naito degenerated as ＂the policy scholars＂ to serve for the Japanese＇invasions to China is the pre - war Japanese intellectuals had done the sad folly.

关 键 词：内藤湖南 民国初期 “支那论” 日本对华“使命论” 

分 类 号：K313[历史地理—历史学]