试论汤显祖的《花间集》评点  

On Tang Xianzu's notes to Huajian Ji

作　　者：赵山林[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系,上海200062

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第1期93-101,125,共9页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划项目"上海戏曲史"(2004BWY002)阶段性成果

摘　　要：汤显祖喜爱《花间集》由来已久,晚年更为其作了评点。曾有学者批评汤显祖的评点"内容极为贫乏",窃以为不够恰当,事实上汤显祖的评点覆盖面相当广:在内容方面,不仅阐发了花间艳词的情感内涵,而且揭示了花间词丰富的内容,以事实证明"词为艳科"之说是片面的;在艺术方面,对花间词的艺术特征进行了多角度探索,选择了词境与诗境、词境与画境相比较的批评视角;在词史方面,探讨了花间词的艺术渊源,也探讨了花间词对宋词乃至元明曲的影响。鉴于汤显祖在文坛的地位和评点本身的质量,他的评点不仅扩大了《花间集》的影响,推进了词学及诗词曲研究,而且为我们探讨他的戏曲创作道路、创作特色及其成因提供了丰富的资料。Tang Xianzu's appreciation of Huajian Ji started early in his life.He made explanatory notes to it in his late years.Though his notes were said to be 'woefully inadequate',his notes were comprehensive: he demonstrated with examples that the statement of Ci is a genre of vulgar taste was partial;artistically he stated the characteristics of Huajian Ci;historically he traced the origin of Huajian Ci and discussed its influence on Ci in the Song Dynasty and Qu in the Yuan and Ming Dynasty.Tang Xiaozu's influence on Chinese literature and the excellence of his notes have contributed to the popularity of Huajian Ji and therefore promoted the research on poetry,Ci and Qu.Besides,his notes are also an important source for people today to study his opera writing history,writing style and its reasons.

关 键 词：汤显祖 《花间集》 评点 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]