检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008 [2]浙江财经学院经贸学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2012年第1期48-57,共10页Law and Social Development
基 金:国家"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目"转型期法治的理论;制度与实证研究"(203000-123210301);教育部人文社科一般项目"转型期多元纠纷解决机制的实证研究"(09YJC820105);光华学者岗项目"国际法治与中国法治良性互动之研究";浙江财经学院校级重大课题"经济模型与经济现实"(2006YJ12)
摘 要:分析和解决社会问题有多种进路。法经济学仰仗其强大的解释力和不断自我升级的活力,为分析社会问题提供了一种新颖实用的视角。我们可以运用法经济学的分析范式研究禁止儿童乞讨的问题。儿童乞讨问题受到社会各界广泛关注。有人建议立法干预,甚至全面禁止儿童乞讨。通过法经济学的视角可以剖析儿童乞讨问题的社会根源,并就制度设计过程中需要界清的有关概念以及各种社会成本与收益进行分析,进而按照法经济学的评价体系对各种主张进行考察,从技术层面与国际比较的层面上对禁止儿童乞讨作出制度设计或改进方面的具体分析与建议。There are many ways to analyze and solve social problems. Legal economics, relying on its strong explanatory power and vitality of continuous self - for analyzing social problems. We can make use of the upgrading, provides a novel and practical perspective analysis paradigm of legal economics to research the problem of prohibiting children begging. The public has paid comprehensive attention to the problem. Someone suggests intervening by legislation, and even totally prohibiting children begging. We can dissect the social root of children begging in the view of legal economics, analyze related concepts and all kinds of social costs and benefits which need to be defined in the process of system design, and further investigate various ar- guments according to the evaluating system of legal economics. And vices on system design or improvement of prohibiting children al comparison. begging then, we make specific analysis and ad- in the level of technique and internation-
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249