醉驾:“一律入刑”还是“区别对待”  

Drunk Driving: "Uniform Crimination" or "Discriminative Treatment"

作　　者：陈伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2012年第1期119-132,共14页Law and Social Development

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题"科学发展观与刑法改革研究"(CSL-D0959)

摘　　要：如何合理划定"醉驾"犯罪圈的大小,"一律入刑"与"区别对待"两种见解存在实质性分歧。罪刑法定原则作为刑事司法不可逾越的屏障,司法机关应该通过"一律入刑"呼应其明确性要求,同时限制司法机关的权力扩张;主观主义与客观主义作为两种不同的解释方式,在实践选择的位阶上应该以文本映射的主观主义优先适用;刑法总分体系需要刑事立法与司法进行一体化贯彻,在刑事立法已然兼顾总则要求的前提下不能通过"区别对待"再次限缩分则罪名的适用范围;"一律入刑"的主张不违背宽严相济刑事政策的内在精神,刑事政策的刑法化要求刑事司法必须坚守这一法治立场。There is a radical bifurcation between ＂uniform erimination＂ and ＂discriminative treatment＂. The principle of legality acting as the safeguard of criminal justice, judicgture department shall answer its de- finitude and limit own power. Subjectivism and objectivism construction mode tells us that the subjectivism re- sult from criterion text shall take precedence. The criminal law system of general rules and special part runs through the criminal legislation and justice, and it is not proper to restrict special part bound again after crimi nal legislation has given attention to general principal request. ＂uniform crimination＂ does not violate the policy of tempering justice with mercy, and criminal policy affecting the development of criminal law decides the criminal justice must abide by the position of rule by law.

关 键 词：醉驾 一律入刑 区别对待 罪刑法定 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]