TRIPS协议第29条与遗传资源来源披露义务  

On the Relationship between the Article 29 of TRIPS Agreement and the "Disclosure of Origin" Requirements in Patent Applications

作　　者：梁志文[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出　　处：《世界贸易组织动态与研究（上海对外贸易学院学报）》2012年第1期42-49,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"专利法信息披露规则研究"(项目批准号:10YJC820066)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：遗传资源来源披露义务是否能够得到TRIPS协议的支持,不同国家态度不一,这取决于对TRIPS协议第29条是否能够涵盖该义务的不同解释。TRIPS协议第29条规定的是作为可专利性条件的专利公开充分性标准。发展中国家试图建立遗传资源来源披露义务的四项目标中,前三项与TRIPS协议第29条是兼容的。我国专利法第26条第5款规定了符合前三项的遗传资源来源披露义务,但其法律效力不同于公开充分性标准。为了实现该义务的法律目标,我国专利法应该予以修订,规定违反该义务而获得的专利权不予执行之法律后果。Different countries have different opinions on whether the ＂Disclosure of Origin＂ Requirements in Patent Applications （＂DOR＂） are supported by the article 29 of TRIPS Agreement, which is dependent on how to interpret the article 29 of TRIPS Agreement. The article 29 of TRIPS Agreement is the sufficient disclosure requirement for obtaining a patent. DOR in patent applications that embodies the interests of the developing country has four objectives. The first three objectives are content with the article 29 of TRIPS Agreement. DOR, stipulated by the paragraph 5 of article 26 of Chinese Patent Law, achieves these three objectives, but has different legal effect. In order to achieve these legal objectives, Chinese Patent Law shall stipulate the liability rules for violating the obligations of the requirements.

关 键 词：TRIPS协议第29条 专利公开 遗传资源来源披露 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]