检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘芳利[1] 张小明[1] 肖波[1] 唐伟[1] 蒲宇[1] 翟邵华[1] 黄小华[1] 顾鹏[2] 刘健[2]
机构地区:[1]川北医学院附属医院放射科,南充637000 [2]川北医学院附属医院超声科,南充637000
出 处:《中国医学计算机成像杂志》2011年第5期459-464,共6页Chinese Computed Medical Imaging
基 金:四川省省属高校科研创新团队建设计划(KYTD201007)~~
摘 要:目的:比较MRI和超声(US)在诊断肝内外胆管结石(BDS)中的价值。方法:收集2010年5月至2011年2月拟诊BDS的住院病例共136例,在我院同时行MRI和US,以手术发现为金标准比较两种检查方法诊断BDS的准确率、灵敏度和特异度;以及比较分析两种检查方法诊断BDS的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果:该136例中,82例行手术治疗。手术证实43例有肝内胆管结石(IHL),73例有肝外胆管结石(EHL),其中34例同时有肝内外胆管结石。MRI和US诊断IHL的灵敏度、特异度和准确率分别为93.0%、94.9%和93.9%,79.1%、94.9%和86.6%;MRI和US诊断EHL的灵敏度、特异度和准确率分别为65.8%、66.7%和65.9%,93.2%、77.8%和91.5%。MRI和US诊断IHL的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.971和0.964(P>0.05);MRI和US诊断EHL的曲线下面积分别为0.855和0.776(P<0.05).结论:在诊断IHL时,MRI与US诊断价值相当,而对于EHL,MRI明显优于US。Purpose: To compare the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonograph) (US) in the diagnosis of bile duct stone (BDS) . Methods: A total of 136 consecutive patients with sus pected BDS were recruited from May 2010 to February 2011. They were performed both abdominal ME imaging and US at the same period before surgery. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI ant US based on surgery were analyzed. The areas under receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves wer( calculated for comparing MRI with US in the diagnosis of BDS. Results: Among the 136 patients, 82 pa tients were performed surgery and were confirmed with BDS. Of the 82 patients with BDS, 43 patient, had intrahepatic lithiasis (IHL), 73 patients (34 patients coexisted with IHL) had extrahepatic lithiasis, (EHL). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US and MRI in detecting IHL were 79.1%, 94.9 % and 86.6%, and 93.0%, 94.9% and 93.9%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of US anc MRI in detecting EHL were 65.8%, 66.7% and 65.9%, and 93.2%, 77.8% and 91.5% respectively. The areas under ROC curves for MRI and US in detecting IHL were 0. 971 and 0. 964, respectively (P 〉 0.05) and in diagnosing EHL were 0. 855 and 0. 776, respectively(P 〈 0.05) . Conclusion: MRI and US have similar value in detecting IHL. However, MRI is superior to US in detecting EHL.
关 键 词:胆管结石 肝内胆管结石 肝外胆管结石 磁共振成像 超声
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R445.1[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145