检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘聿辉[1] 徐亮[1] 李姗姗[1] 陈兆秋[1] 刘力恒[1] 侯中煜[2] 李万湖[1] 侯栋梁[3] 刘晓珊[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省肿瘤防治研究院放射科,济南250117 [2]山东大学附属省立医院放射科,济南250021 [3]北京肿瘤医院放疗科,北京100142
出 处:《山东大学学报(医学版)》2011年第12期118-122,共5页Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
摘 要:目的探讨3.0T磁共振联合乳腺磁共振计算机辅助系统(MRI-CAD)在良、恶性乳腺肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值。方法分别利用3.0TMRI工作站(MRI法)和MRI-CAD(CAD法)对78例患者共93个乳腺病灶进行良、恶性鉴别诊断,内容包括形态学分析和时间信号曲线分析,比较两种方法的诊断正确率。结果在93个病灶中CAD法诊断正确率高于MRI法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);MRI法和CAD法在51例肿块样病变中诊断正确率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);CAD法在42例非肿块样病变中诊断正确率高于MRI法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MRI-CAD与利用MRI工作站比较,在良、恶性乳腺肿瘤特别是非肿块样病灶的鉴别诊断中具有明显优势。Objective To explore the clinical value of 3.0Tesla magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) combined with computer aided diagnosis(MRI-CAD) in differentiating benign and malignant breast tumors.Methods MRI and MRI-CAD were used in the diagnosis of a total of 93 breast lesions from 78 patients,including morphological and time-intensity-curve analysis.Accuracies of the two methods were compared.Results MRI-CAD had a statistically better accuracy than MRI(P0.05).For 51 mass-like lesions,MRI and MRI-CAD had no difference in diagnostic accuracy(P0.05),while for 42 non-mass-like lesions,MRI-CAD was statistically better(P0.05).Conclusion MRI-CAD has a notable advantage over MRI in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors,especially non-mass-like tumors.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145