检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院昆明植物研究所生物多样性和生物地理学重点实验室,昆明650204
出 处:《植物科学学报》2011年第6期755-762,共8页Plant Science Journal
摘 要:至少上溯至《神农本草经》,我国已具备了有据可查的较为系统的植物分类编目,惟古代的植物分类编目及发展主要依循本草学传统,偏重于药用、饮食、园林布景等现实用途,终未形成现代意义上的系统科学分类,以致在近代落后于西方。文中较全面地回顾了我国植物分类编目的历史,综合比较了现在省级行政区的地方植物志和国家植物志等情况,并结合现在已完成的植物志编研过程中的问题,对我国未来的植物分类编目提出了展望。同时在文中指出了现在国内许多自然保护区以及其他建设项目的环境评价中涉及的植物调查编目缺乏标本凭证的现象,强调了植物分类编目过程中凭证标本的重要性。Dating at least as far back as"Shen Nong’ s Herbal Classic",China has had a systematic plant catalog.However,the development of ancient plant catalogs mainly follows herbal tradition and concentrates on practical purposes such as medicine,food,and garden aesthe-tics,which has tended to limit scientific classification compared to the West.In this paper,we conducted an overall review of the history of Chinese plant cataloging and a comprehensive comparison of all finished or ongoing Floras in the current provincial administrative regions and the Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae(FRPS).We also examined the problems exposed in the compilation of the finished Floras and put forward an outlook for the future of Chinese plant cataloging.We also determined a common phenomenon in plant cataloguing regarding environmental assessment of nature reserves and other projects,which has emphasized the importance of keeping voucher specimens in plant cataloging.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3