论支持改进的科研质量评价  

Scientific research evaluation in order to support quality improvement

作　　者：周文泳[1] 

机构地区：[1]同济大学经济与管理学院,上海200092

出　　处：《科研管理》2012年第1期96-102,共7页Science Research Management

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目"支持改进的高校研究机构的科研质量评价研究"(编号07CJY007);起止时间2007.4-2011.3;上海市软科学基金重点项目"科研项目评价机制研究(A)"(编号:09692100200);起止时间2009.5-2010.5

摘　　要：现行定量科研评价忽视了评价结果对科研质量改进的导向作用,容易对科技领域的创新活动起到负面效果。本文旨在提供一种评价与改进相结合的科研质量评价的思想方法与应用策略。应用因果分析方法,分析了科研质量的构成要素及其内在联系;借鉴学术界在质量评价、科研评价和质量改进领域的相关研究成果,论述了支持改进的科研质量评价的基本原理(内涵、评价目标与准则、评价思路与工作流程);结合我国高校研究机构的基本现状,探讨了支持改进的科研质量评价理论成果的应用难点与实施对策。本文的研究成果,弥补了科研领域的符合性评价与质量奖评价的局限性,也为我国高校研究机构提升科研质量提供了一种新的途径。Current quantitative scientific research evaluation overlooks the guiding role of its outcome for improving the scientific research quality. It might exert negative effects on the innovation activities of science and technology. The objectives of the study are to propose the thinking method and applied strategies of scientific research quality evaluation with the combination of assess- ment and improvement. By using Causal Analysis （ CA）, components of scientific research quality and their relationships were analyzed. And then, in terms of relevant research findings in the field of quality evaluation, scientific research evaluation, and quality improvement, the basic principle of Scientific Research Evaluation to Support Quality Improvement （SRESQI）, including the connotations, targets, norms, ideas, and working process, is put forward. Moreover, several obstacles and their correspond- ing suggestions for applying the theoretical achievement of SRESQI in Chinese universities and research institutions according to their status quo are discussed. The achievement might compensate for the limitations of conformity assessments and quality awards in this field, and provide Chinese universities and research institutions with a new approach to improve on scientific research quality.

关 键 词：科研质量 质量评价 质量改进 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学] G311