检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省中西医结合医院
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2012年第2期317-318,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
摘 要:目的比较不同行政干预力度,对医护人员手卫生依从性和洗手合格率的影响。方法采用盲目、随机方法对当班医务人员手卫生依从率进行调查,并采用两种不同的取样方法对照检测比较合格率,观察医务人员手卫生的依从性,合格率及其影响因素。结果医师、护士、医技人员手卫生的依从性分别为46.2%、51.9%、23.3%,手卫生合格率分别为82.1%、98.0%、60.8%,医技科室医务人员明显低于临床科室医师、护士;两种对照检测方法结果显示,χ2=50.82,差异有统计学意义。结论行政干预对提高医护人员手卫生依从性有非常重要的作用,人为因素对检测结果的合格率有重要的影响,必须提高检验结果的精确性。OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of different administrative intervention strengths on the medical staff's compliance with hand hygiene and hand washing compliance rate.METHODS Hand hygiene compliance rate of medical staff on duty was randomly investigated,and 2 different sampling methods were used to perform controlled detection and compare qualified rates.Hand hygiene compliance of medical personnels,qualified rate and influencing factors were analyzed.RESULTS Hand hygiene compliance rates of doctors,nurses and medical technicians were 46.2%,51.9% and 23.3% respectively.Qualified rates of hand hygiene were 82.1%,98.0% and 60.8% respectively.The results for staff in medical technical departments were significantly lower than doctors and nurses in clinical departments.Two detection methods showed significant difference(χ2=50.82).CONCLUSION Administrative intervention plays a very important role in improving hand hygiene compliance of healthcare workers.Since human factors can easily affect on the qualified rate of the test,we must improve the accuracy of test results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117