两种皮试方法在青霉素类及头孢菌素类药物皮试中的比较研究  

Two Kinds of Methods in the Penicillin Skin Test Class and Cephalosporin Skin Test in A Comparative Study

作　　者：刘世亮 张辉 

机构地区：[1]山东省胶南市王台中心卫生院,山东胶南266425

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2012年第2期21-22,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的比较传统皮内注射法与快速过敏皮试仪在青霉素类及头孢菌素类药物皮试的差异。方法 200例患者随机分为观察组和对照组。对照组采用传统皮内注射的方法 ,观察组采用快速过敏皮试仪的方法。观察并比较两组的皮试效果。结果观察组患者皮试阴性,注射青霉素类及头孢菌素类药物发生过敏反应的概率为3%,对照组患者皮试阴性,注射青霉素类及头孢菌素类药物发生过敏反应的概率为1%。结论快速皮试仪与传统皮内注射法在青霉素类及头孢菌素类药物皮试比较能够提高患者的顺应性,但皮试的准确率降低。Objective To compare the traditional intradermal injection and fast over Minpi tester in penicillin and cephalosporin skin test differences.Methods 200 patients were randomly divided into two groups and the control group.Control group using the traditional method of intradermal injection of the observation group had Minpi tester using fast methods.Observe and compare the two groups of skin test results.Results The skin test-negative patients,injection of penicillin and cephalosporin allergic reaction probability of 3% in the control group were skin test negative,injecting penicillin and cephalosporin allergic reaction probability of 1%.Conclusion Rapid skin test instrument with the traditional method of intradermal injection of penicillin and cephalosporin skin test compared to improve patient compliance,but the skin test accuracy rate.

关 键 词：青霉素 头孢 皮试 

分 类 号：R978.1[医药卫生—药品]