检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第6期113-117,共5页Journal of Northeast Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部2008年新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(编号:NCET-08-0669);黑龙江省教育厅新世纪人才支持计划项目(编号:1153-NCET-001)
摘 要:早期西方马克思主义代表卢卡奇和法兰克福学派的重要代表弗洛姆都对马克思的异化理论有所继承,也都对20世纪新出现的异化现象进行了深入的研究,二者都通过异化理论对当今资本主义展开了深刻的批判。但是,他们异化理论产生的时代背景、对异化现象的关注、关于异化原因的分析及消除异化途径的探讨又表现出很大的不同。本文旨在比较弗洛姆与卢卡奇异化理论的异同,使人们对当代的异化现象有新的认识。The main representative Lukacs of the early western Marxism and important representative Fromm of the Frankfurt School have inherited the alienation theory of Marx, and they also carried on the in - depth research on the emerging of alienation phenomenon in the 20th century, and they both had a profound criticism on modern capitalism by using the alienation theories. However, the emergence of the backgrounds and concerns of alienation theories are different, meanwhile, the analysis on the causes of alienation, and the discussion on elimination of alienation ways also show the great difference. Therefore, this paper aims to compare the similarity and difference between Fromm and Lukacs' alienation theories, and provides a new understanding on contemporary alienation phenomena.
关 键 词:异化物化消费异化
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229