检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林承铎[1]
出 处:《北京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2011年第6期59-65,共7页Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:瑞典斯德哥尔摩大学知识产权研究所项目支持
摘 要:软件产业的快速发展引起了诸多著作权争议。从欧盟与美国的立法与司法实践看,软件反向工程基本已经合法化,然而,若干著作仅争议却仍然存在,主要体现在合理使用的实际认定。我国的立法相较西安国家则显得较为保守,然而随着经济的发展,类似案件将愈来越多,司法适用将变得越来越重要。通过比较的方式,针对欧盟与美国的相关规则与法律适用进行分析,以探讨对我国立法及司法的借鉴可能。There are so many copyright infringement disputes aroused by the software industry's fast development. From the legislation and judicial practice in EU and the U. S, the software's decompilation basically has become legalized; however, there still exist some copyright issues that incarnate into the field of fair-use definition. Compare to the western country's legislation, our legislation has showed conservatively, but along with the economic development, the similar cases may be more and more and the judicial application will become increasingly important. Through the comparison, we can discuss the applicable possibility from the analysis of EU and U. S relative regulations and judicial applications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7