机构地区:[1]中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室,湖南长沙410125 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100049 [3]湖南大学环境科学与工程学院,湖南长沙410082
出 处:《生态学报》2012年第2期538-547,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向(KZCX2-YW-437);国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BADC6B05);领域前沿(O651054040)
摘 要:土壤持水性能是决定生态系统水源涵养能力的关键,是自然保护区生态服务功能的重要方面。以湖南省乌云界自然保护区为研究区域,选取森林、灌丛、竹林和草地4个典型生态系统,采用野外调查采样和室内分析的方法研究了土壤的物理性质和持水性能。结果表明,乌云界4种典型植被下表层0—20cm土壤有机质含量普遍较高(>76 g/kg)、容重较低(<0.85 g/cm3)、团聚体稳定性较强(>5mm水稳性团聚体达22.7%—52.3%),表明保护区土壤的结构发育总体上较好。森林和竹林土壤具有较多的大孔隙和较高的饱和导水率,有利于天然降水向地下水的转化,而灌丛和草地土壤毛管孔隙度则相对较高,其土壤中能够保持更多的有效水分。乌云界自然保护区4个典型生态系统0—40cm土层土壤重力水容量为:森林(83.5 mm)>竹林(79.2mm)>灌丛(66.9 mm)>草地(43.8 mm),有效水容量为:草地(128.7 mm)>灌丛(111.6 mm)>森林(95.9 mm)>竹林(83.9mm)。在明晰土壤总蓄水容量(>0 MPa)、重力水容量(0—0.01 MPa)、有效水容量(0.01—1.5 MPa)、无效水容量(>1.5 MPa)等概念的基础上,建议用重力水容量和土壤有效水容量两个指标来评价生态系统土壤的水源涵养功能,其中土壤重力水容量可以反映生态系统补充地下水和调控河川径流量的能力,而土壤有效水容量可以反映生态系统本身保蓄水分的潜力,这些指标均可以通过土壤水分特征曲线进行求算。乌云界自然保护区森林和竹林土壤对于补充地下水和调控河川径流量的能力较强,而灌丛和草地土壤保蓄水分的能力较强。Soil water holding capacity is the key index of water conservation capacity of ecosystems and vital parameter of ecological service function in Nature Reserve. Four typical ecosystems including forest, shrub, bamboo, and grassland were selected in the study area of Wuyunjie Nature Reserve (WNR) of Hunan Province and soil physical properties and water holding capacity were studied through field investigation, soil sampling, and laboratory analysis. The results showed that the four typical vegetation-covered lands had greater soil organic matter content ( 〉76 g/kg), lower bulk density ( 〈0.85 g/cm3 ), and higher soil aggregate stability ( stable aggregate ( 〉5 mm in diameter) contents ranging from 22.7% to 52. 3% ) in the surface soil layer (0-20cm) than the local farmland, suggesting that soil structural development was generallybetter in the reserve area. Soil macroporosity were greater than those in shrub and grasslan and saturated hydraulic conductivity d ecosystems, which were beneficial However, soil capillary porosity in shrub and could be reserved. The gravimetric soil water (Ks) in forest and bamboo ecosystems to the rainfall transfer to groundwater. grassland ecosystems were higher, indicating that more soil available water holding capacity ( WHCs ) in the 0-40 cm soil layer under four typical ecosystems in WNR changed in the following order: forest (83.5 mm) 〉 bamboo (79.2 ram) 〉 shrub (66.9 mm) 〉 grassland (43.8 mm). However, soil available water holding capacity (WHCa) were the following: grassland ( 128.7 mm) 〉 shrub ( 111.6 mm) 〉 forest (95.9 mm) 〉 bamboo (83.9 mm). On the basis of verifying the definition of total water capacity ( 〉0 MPa), WHCg(0-0. 01 MPa), WHCa(0. 01-1.5 MPa), and unavailable water capacity ( 〉1.5 MPa), we recommended that WHCs and WHCa could be used to measure soil water holding capacity of ecosystems. WHCs could be used to assess the capability of recharging groundwater
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...