检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中医学报》2012年第2期257-258,共2页Acta Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨小针刀配合中药内服治疗跟痛症的疗效。方法:将109例跟痛症患者随机分为对照组42例和治疗组67例,治疗组采用小针刀配合中药内服治疗跟痛症;对照组采用体积分数为2%盐酸利多卡因2~5 mL与强的松龙15~20 mg混悬液局部痛点注射。结果:治疗组优49例,占73.13%;良12例,占17.91%;可4例,占5.97%;差2例,占2.99%。本组优良率为91.04%。对照组优23例,占54.76%;良9例,占21.43%;可6例,占14.29%;差4例,占9.52%。本组优良率为76.19%。经统计学处理,两组优良率有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:小针刀配合中药内服治疗跟痛症能获得较好的疗效。Objective:To investigate the therapeutic effect of needle-knife therapy combined with Chinese medicine in treating heel pain.Methods:The treatment group adopted needle-knife therapy combined with Chinese medicine for heel pain;In the control group,local trigger points were selected and injected with mixed and suspended solution of 2-5 mL 2% lidocaine and 15-20 mg prednisolone.Results:In the treatment group,49 cases were markedly effective,accounting for 73.13%;12 cases effective,accounting for 17.91%;4 cases slightly effective,accounting for 5.97%;2 cases were ineffectively treated,accounting for 2.99%.Effective rate was 91.04% in this group.In the control group,23 cases were markedly effective,accounting for 54.76%;9 cases effective,accounting for 21.43%;6 cases slightly effective,accounting for 14.29%;4 cases were ineffectively treated,accounting for 9.52%.The total effective rate was 76.19% in this group.Through statistic process and analysis,there was significant difference(P〉0.01).Conclusion:Needle-knife therapy combined with Chinese medicine shows excellent therapeutic effect in treating the heel pain.
分 类 号:R245.3[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117