分期综合方案治疗腰椎间盘突出症60例  

Phased comprehensive treatment for lumbar disc herniation in 60 cases

作　　者：李长辉[1] 郑其开[1] 张坤木[1] 陈少清[2] 刘家瑞[1] 蔡树河[1] 陈水金[1] 黄道星 陈素玲 陈泽文 宋红梅[1] 陈艺敏[1] 陈锦辉[1] 王诗忠[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]福建中医药大学附属第二人民医院,福建350003 [2]福建中医药大学 [3]尤溪县中医院 [4]邵武市人民医院

出　　处：《北京中医药大学学报（中医临床版）》2011年第6期10-12,共3页Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：福建省科技厅重点项目资助课题(No.2010Y0028);福建省卫生厅资助课题(No.wzzk0907)

摘　　要：目的通过临床随机对照研究探讨分期综合方案与传统综合疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法将符合标准的120例患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各60例,治疗组采用分期综合方案,对照组采用传统综合疗法。分别记录治疗后症状体征改变情况,再根据所得数据进行统计学分析。结果治疗组在JOA量表评分、目测类比疼痛评分(VAS)改善方面与对照组比较有显著性差异。2组痊愈率、好转率差异比较均有统计学意义。结论分期综合方案治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效优于传统综合疗法。Objective To discuss the curative effects of phased comprehensive treatment and traditional combined therapy on lumbar disc herniation （LDH） through randomized controlling and studying in clinic. Methods All patients accorded with the standard （n=120） were randomly divided into the treatment group and control group （each n=60）. The treatment group was treated with phased comprehensive treatment and the control group, with traditional combined therapy. The changes of symptoms and signs were recorded after the treatment and the data was analyzed statistically. Results The improvement of Japanese Orthopaedic Association （JOA） scale scores and visual analogue pain scores （VAS） had significant difference in the treatment group compared with those in the control group. The comparison in the cure rate and improvement rate was statistically different between two groups. Conclusion The curative effect of phased comprehensive treatment is better than that of traditional combined therapy in LDH treatment.

关 键 词：分期综合方案 传统综合疗法 随机对照 腰椎间盘突出症 临床疗效 

分 类 号：R274[医药卫生—中医骨伤科学]