检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属无锡精神卫生中心内科,214151 [2]南京医科大学附属无锡精神卫生中心精神科,214151
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第35期4268-4270,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨自我管理教育对糖尿病伴抑郁症患者的影响,旨在提高患者自我管理能力。方法将85例患者随机分为教育组43例和对照组42例,对照组接受一般说教式健康教育,教育组患者参与自我管理教育活动,采用自行设计的自我管理行为问卷及抑郁自评量表(SDS)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)调查患者自我管理行为和抑郁状况,8周后比较两组患者自我管理行为、抑郁状况、空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖控制状况。结果干预前两组患者自我管理行为评分、SDS、HAMD、空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05);8周后教育组患者服药依从性得分为(1.77±0.504)分,并发症的管理为(2.19±0.588)分,SDS(29.3±4.8)分、HAMD(11.5±6.9)分、空腹血糖(5.3±1.4)mmol/L、餐后2h血糖(8.6±1.1)mmol/L,对照组分别为(1.32±0.744),(1.83±0.590),(36.5±5.4),(18.3±1.3)分,(9.2±2.1),(11.1±2.2)mmol/L,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.813,3.358,2.91,2.34,2.65,2.78;P〈0.01),教育组患者自我管理行为问卷其他4项评分也高于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论自我管理教育能有效提高患者自我管理能力,控制患者血糖水平和改善抑郁症状,值得临床推广应用。Objective To explore the influence of serf-management education on the diabetes patients with depression with a view to improve patient self-management skills. Methods 85 cases were randomly divided into two groups : the experimental group ( n = 43 ) and the control group ( n = 42 ), general health knowledge education was applied to patients in control group, and patients in experimental group took part in the self- management education activity, the status of self-management education and depression were tested by Zung' S Depression self-rating scale (SDS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24, HAMD), the self-management, depression, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial 2 h blood glucose (2 h PG) were compared between the two groups after eight weeks later. Results The score of self-management, SDS, HAMD, fasting plasma glucose and postprandial 2 h blood glucose were similar between the two groups before intervention ( P 〉 0. 05 ). After 8 weeks, the results of compliance of the self-management, manage of complications, SDS, HAMD, fasting plasma glucose, postprandial 2 h blood glucose were ( 1.77± 0.504), (2.19 ± 0.588 ), (29.3 ± 4.8), ( 11.5 ± 6.9 ), ( 5.3 ± 1.4) and ( 8.6 ±1.1 ) in experimental group, respectively; but were ( 1.32 ± 0.744), ( 1.83 ± 0.590), (36.5±5.4) ,( 18.3 ±1.3), (9.2±2. 1 ), ( 11.1 ±2. 2) in control group, there were significantly different between the two groups ( t = 2. 813,3. 358,2. 91,2. 34,2. 65,2. 78 ; P 〈0. 01 ). another four items of selfmanagement were obviously higher than in control group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusions Self-management education can improve the patients' ability of self-management, it also can control the blood glucose level and improve the depression status, it is worthy of spreading in clinical.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.124