检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛云娜[1] 马延爱[1] 季衍丽[2] 霍云云[3] 赵倩倩[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院神经内科监护室,北京100853 [2]解放军总医院神经内科三病区,北京100853 [3]解放军总医院神经内科二病区,北京100853
出 处:《中华现代护理杂志》2011年第35期4380-4381,共2页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
摘 要:目的比较两种吸痰方法防止脑卒中机械通气患者食物反流的效果。方法选取26例脑卒中机械通气患者为研究对象,采取自身对照法,单日采用试验吸痰法,双日采用常规吸痰法,比较两种方法食物反流次数。结果试验吸痰法的反流率为7.0%,低于常规吸痰法的反流率13.7%,差异有统计学意义(x2=11.24,P〈0.05)。结论对于脑卒中机械通气患者采用试验吸痰法可以减少食物的反流率,从而减少吸人性肺炎的发生,有利于患者的康复。Objective To comparison the effect of two different ways of sputum aspiration for food reflux in stroke patients with mechanical ventilation. Methods Experimental sputum aspiration method and conventional sputum aspiration method were applied in 26 stroke patients with mechanical ventilation to conduct the self-control study. Two different ways of sputum aspiration for food reflux were compared (experimental sputum aspiration in odd numbered clays VS routine sputum aspiration in even numbered days). Results There were significantly differences in food reflux rate with two ways: experimental sputum aspiration method was 7.0%, and another was 13.7 % ( X2 = 11.24, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions Experimental sputum aspiration method applied in stroke patients with mechanical ventilation can reduce food reflux rate, thereby reduce the incidence of aspiration pneumonia and was beneficial for the rehabilitation of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28