检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫翔[1] 范慧民[1] 李钰[1] 沈桂林[1] 陈曦[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军成都军区总医院老年病科,成都610083
出 处:《中国医院用药评价与分析》2011年第12期1126-1128,共3页Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-use in Hospitals of China
摘 要:目的:评价降阶梯治疗策略治疗老年重症肺炎的疗效。方法:回顾分析2008年1月—2011年1月解放军成都军区总医院老年科重症肺炎患者42例,分为治疗组(降阶梯治疗组,21例)和对照组(传统治疗组,21例),比较2组的不适当抗生素治疗发生率、临床疗效、细菌清除率、感染控制天数、住院费用等指标。结果:治疗组与对照组比较总有效率分别为90.48%(19/21)、61.90%(13/21);细菌清除率分别为82.60%(19/23)、59.09%(13/22);感染控制天数分别为(8.5±4.8)、(13.3±6.4)d,2组比较差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.05);不适当抗生素治疗发生率和住院费用明显低于对照组,差异显著,有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:抗生素降阶梯疗法能迅速控制感染,提高治愈率,对老年重症肺炎可获得良好疗效。OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic de-escalation therapy for elder patients with severe pneumonia.METHODS: A total of 42 old patients with severe pneumonia hospitalized in PLA General Hospital of Chengdu Military Command from Jan.2008 to Jan.2011 were assigned to receive either antibiotic de-escalation therapy(treatment group,n=21) or traditional therapy(control group,n=21),with the incidence of improper antibiotic treatment,clinical efficacy,bacterial clearance rate,days of infection control and hospitalization costs etc analyzed retrospectively.RESULTS: In the treatment group vs.control group,the total effective rate was 990.48%(19/21) vs.61.90%(13/21),with bacterial clearance rate of 82.60%(19/23) vs.59.09%(13/22),infection control of(8.5±4.8) days vs.(13.3±6.4) days,all showing significant differences(P0.05).There were significant differences in incidence of improper antibiotic treatment and hospitalization costs between the two groups(P0.01).CONCLUSION: Antibiotic de-escalation therapy is of remarkable efficacy for severe pneumonia in elderly patients for it can rapidly keep the infection under control and increase the cure rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.100.57