国内外机载设备电磁环境验证标准分析  

Difference Analysis of Airborne Equipment Electromagnetic Environment Certification Standards in China and Abroad

作　　者：韩征[1] 齐亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国民航大学

出　　处：《安全与电磁兼容》2011年第6期29-32,共4页Safety & EMC

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费"民机机载设备电磁环境适航验证方法研究"项目(ZXH2009A001)

摘　　要：RTCA/DO-160G和GJB 151A/152A-97都涉及了电磁环境验证,高强度辐射场(HIRF)试验是重点的验证项目,比较分析这两个标准对该项目在测试条件、测试对象及测试方法的差异,得出对于飞机机载设备的传导敏感度和辐射敏感度的试验,采用GJB 151A/152A可能会出现要求过高的情况,而采用RTCA/DO-160G则更加方便灵活。The standard RTCA/DO-160G, American Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment, and China national military standard GJB 151A/152A-97, Measurement of Electromagnetic Emission and Susceptibility for Military Equipment and Subsystems, have large differences in electromagnetic environment certification. The tests relevant to High Intensity Radiated Field （HIRF） are emphasized. Both standards include test items associated with HIRF. The test conditions, objects and methods in these two standards are compared. Finally, the result shows that the test requirements in GJB 151A/152A-97 may be much stricter, and the requirements in RTCA/DO-160G is more flexible and convenience.

关 键 词：机载设备 电磁环境 高强度辐射场 

分 类 号：V216-65[航空宇航科学与技术—航空宇航推进理论与工程]