检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冉瑞明[1] 陈平[1] 史光东[1] 康忠明[1] 邓大河[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡中心医院平湖分院内科,重庆市404000
出 处:《中国基层医药》2012年第1期38-39,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的观察血管紧张素受体拈抗剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂单用及联合应用对扩张型心肌病(DCM)的临床疗效。方法将95例DCM患者随机分为ARB组(A组)32例,给予厄贝沙坦150mg,1次/d,无不良反应,渐增量300mg;B受体阻滞剂组(B组)30例,给予比索洛尔1.25mg,1次/d,无不良反应,每1—2周剂量倍增至患者能耐受;ARB和B受体阻滞剂联合组(AB组)33例,以上两药联合应用至患者能耐受的最大剂量。三组均长期维持治疗,疗程12个月。结果A、B、AB三组总有效率分别为84.37%、80.40%、93.93%,AB组与A、B组差异均有统计学意义(x2=4.95、3.95,均P〈0.05),三组治疗后6min步行距离、左室舒张末期内径(LVEDd)、左室收缩末期内径(LVESd)、左室射血分数(LVEF)与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05),A组与B组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),AB组与A组及B组差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论ARB与B受体阻滞剂联合治疗DCM疗效优于单用ARB或p受体阻滞剂,且耐受好。Objective To investigate the effects of ARB or/and β-blecker in treatment of dilated cardiomy-opathy(DCM). Methods 95 cases with DCM were randomly divided into 3 groups. ARB group( A,32 cases) was treated with Irbesartan, 150 mg/d without adverse drug reaction and then to 300 mg/d weekly; β-blocker group( B,30 cases) was treated with Bisoprolol, 1.25 mg/d without adverse drug reaction and then to maximal dose weekly;combi- nation group( AB,33 cases) Was treated with Irbesartan and Bisoprolol to maximal dose which patients were able to tolerate. The 3 groups were observed for a period of 12 months. Results Comparing with pretreatment, the results of 6 rain walk, LVEDd, LVESd, LVEF were improved significantly( all P 〈 0.05 ). There were no significant differences between A group and B group(P 〉0. 05) ,but the differences between combination group and A group or B group were significant( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Effect of ARB combined with β-blocker was better than that of ARB or β-bloc-ker alone in treatment of DCM and well tolerated.
关 键 词:厄贝沙坦 比索洛尔 心肌病 充血性 心力衰竭 左室重构
分 类 号:R542.2[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249