检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柯华[1]
出 处:《财经研究》2012年第2期134-144,共11页Journal of Finance and Economics
摘 要:从20世纪90年代起,中国经济史学研究引入了新制度经济学理论,这是传统经济史学研究方法上的突破。但这些研究大多集中于正式制度对近代企业的影响和运用交易成本或产权理论分析近代企业制度变迁。文章在诺思产权—国家—意识形态的制度变迁理论框架的基础上,以企业代替国家为制度变迁的主体,重点从意识形态视角进行研究,并通过对荣家企业的案例分析,为近代企业史研究提供了一个内在逻辑一致的理论框架。Neo-institutional economic theory was introduced into Chinese economic historiography in the 1990s, which was a breakthrough in traditional economic historiography from the angle of methodology. But most of relevant studies focus on the impacts of formal institutions on modern firms or employ transaction costs and ownership theory to analyze the institutional transition of modern firms. Based on the framework of North's institutional transition theory, whose corner-stone are ownership, state and ideology, this paper regards enterprises as the participant in institutional transition instead of the state and takes Rong family firm as an example from the angle of ideology, thus providing a theoretical framework with internal logic consistency for the study of modern firm history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7