运动员应激评价结果与应对方式的关系及一般自我效能感的调节作用  

The Relationship Between Evaluation of Stress and Coping Style of Athletes and the Effect of General Self-efficacy

作　　者：李静[1] 宋宏伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学体育学院,辽宁大连116029

出　　处：《浙江体育科学》2012年第1期99-102,共4页Zhejiang Sport Science

摘　　要：采用问卷调查和数理统计方法探讨了运动员应激评价结果与应对方式之间的关系及一般自我效能感的影响作用。结果表明:①运动员主要将临场应激评价为挑战性和威胁性压力,评价为挑战性压力时,运动员倾向于采用情绪应对和问题应对;评价为威胁性压力时,运动员倾向于采用回避应对。②一般自我效能感与挑战性和威胁性压力不存在显著性相关关系,但与问题应对呈显著性正相关,与回避应对呈显著性负相关。③一般自我效能感对应激评价结果与应对方式的关系具有显著的调节作用,这一调节作用主要表现为:随着挑战性压力水平的升高,一般自我效能感较高的个体趋向于问题应对,一般自我效能感较低的个体趋向于情绪应对;随着威胁性压力水平的升高,一般自我效能感较高的个体趋向于情绪应对和超越应对,一般自我效能感较低的个体趋向于回避应对。The paper study the relationship between evaluation of stress and coping style of athletes and the effect of general self-efficacy based on the methods of questionnaire and statistics.The result shows： ①Athletes mainly evaluate the stress of competition range as challenge and threatening pressure.When athletes evaluate the stress as challenge,their copying style tend to be motion and question;when athletes evaluate the stress as threatening,their copying style tend to be avoidance.②There is no marked correlativity between the self-efficacy and challenge and threatening pressure,but it can adjust remarkably the relationship between evaluation of stress and coping style.③ The adjustment of general self-efficiency could mainly be observed following： with the rising of challenge pressure,the coping style of athlete with higher self-efficacy tend to be question;with the rising of threatening pressure,the coping style of athlete with higher self-efficacy tend to be motion and exceeding,while the coping style of athlete with lower self-efficacy tend to be avoidance.

关 键 词：运动心理学 应激评价 应对方式 一般自我效能感 运动 

分 类 号：G804.85[文化科学—运动人体科学]