检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院
出 处:《创新》2012年第1期85-90,128,共6页Innovation
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究基金资助项目<中美股东权益救济制度比较研究>(09XJA820015)阶段性成果
摘 要:美国不少州的强制解散公司制定法将压制及其类似行为作为司法解散公司的根据和理由,赋予权益受侵害股东广泛的救济基础;法院在压制行为的司法认定和适用上给予宽泛的解释,并以小股东权益为中心或引入股东合理期待原则来界定压制行为,拓宽了股东寻求司法救济的空间;制定法还授权法院、法院也经常自主地适用各种替代救济,以充分保护股东权益。基于压制行为而救济股东权益的美国公司法理念和灵活适用公司解散及其替代救济措施的制定法做法与司法实践值得我们借鉴。The statutory law on compulsory disbandment of company in many states of the U.S.regards oppression and its similar behaviors as the ground and reason for judicial dissolution of a company,which offers extensive remedies for the shareholders whose rights and interests are infringed.The courts give broad interpretations to the judiciary verdict and application of law for oppression behaviors,and the oppression behaviors are identified according to the principle of focusing on the rights and interests of minority shareholders or introducing the legitimate expectations of shareholders in order to expand the space of seeking judicial remedies by the shareholder.The statutory law also empowers the courts to take various alternative remedy measures or the courts often do them at their own discretion to fully protect the rights and interests of shareholders.It is worth learning from the concept of company law based on oppression,flexible application and judicial practice of statutory law in judiciary dissolution and its alternative remedy measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222