哲学社会科学创新的评价方式论  

On the ways of Evaluation of Philosophy and Social Sciences Innovation

作　　者：熊进[1] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学马克思主义学院,讲师广州510515

出　　处：《社会科学管理与评论》2011年第4期26-34,111,共9页Management and Review of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部重大课题攻关项目<哲学社会科学创新能力及评价研究>(项目号:06JZD0003)阶段性成果

摘　　要：对于哲学社会科学创新的评价而言,从不同的视角和原则出发可以导致不同的评价方式。但是无论何种评价方式,都是对哲学社会科学创新的成果做出恰如其分、符合实际的价值判断。根据对哲学社会科学创新成果进行评价主体的不同可以区分为专家同行、政府机构和公众舆论的评价。不同评价主体的评价方式在理论和实践上有其必要性和合理性,也各自存在着的一些相关问题。For philosophy and social sciences innovation in terms of evaluation from different perspectives and principles can lead to different way of evaluation.But no matter what kind of evaluation methods are crucial to the philosophy and social sciences appropriate to make the achievement of innovation,conforms to the actual value judgments,exactly who will judge the authority to make 'innovation'? According to elaborate from the philosophy and social sciences innovation the subject of evaluation distinguished experts on peer,government apparatus and public and evaluation.The different subjects' ways of evaluation has its necessity and rationality in the theory and practice,also exists respectively some related issues.

关 键 词：哲学社会科学 创新 评价方式 

分 类 号：C0[社会学]