反思被迫行为与紧急避险的关系  

Rethink the Relationship Between Duress and Necessary

作　　者：魏汉涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明理工大学法学院,云南昆明650500

出　　处：《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2011年第6期40-44,97,共6页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：在各国法律中,被迫行为与紧急避险之间的关系表现为三种情况:包含关系、同质并列关系、异质并列关系。事实上,被迫行为与紧急避险是两种不同性质的事由,两者排除罪责的根据具有本质差异。用紧急避险的原理处理被迫行为,会不当地缩小被迫行为的适用范围。将被迫行为从紧急避险中独立出来,不仅有利于公正地对待因胁迫而实施犯罪的人,而且关系到人们对两种行为的道德评价,影响到与第三人的关系,还会使我国刑法排除责任事由的体系更加完善。The relationships between duress and necessary reflect three cases, including relation, homogeneous parallel relation and heterogeneous parallel relation. In fact, duress distinguishes from necessary in nature. The cause that they exempt criminals from criminal responsibility has fundamental differences. It is inevitable to narrow the scope of duress if we apply the doctrine of dealing with necessary to duress. Therefore, duress should be independent from necessary, which not only benefit for dealing with coerced criminals justifiably, but also refer to the moral evaluation Of two types of behavior. In addition, that duress is independent from necessary affects the relationship with the third person, and makes the system exempted criminal responsibility more perfect.

关 键 词：被迫行为 紧急避险 阻却违法事由 阻却责任事由 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]