我国医疗纠纷调解模式之选择  

On the choice of Medical Dispute Mediation Mode in China

作　　者：刘世彧[1] 罗刚[1] 

机构地区：[1]泸州医学院

出　　处：《医学与法学》2011年第2期28-31,共4页Medicine and Jurisprudence

基　　金：本文为基金项目、四川省哲学社会科学规划项目“医疗损害赔偿调解研究--四川省医疗纠纷人民调解委员会的构建”的阶段性成果之一,课题编号：SC09W030.

摘　　要：作为替代性纠纷解决方式的一种，调解被认为能在医疗纠纷的解决中发挥良好的作用。在我国现有的三种医疗纠纷调解模式中，相较于法院调解模式、行政调解模式而言，属于民间调解范畴的医疗纠纷人民调解委员会模式在专业性、中立性、公信力、可及性和有效性方面具有更大的优势。医疗纠纷人民调解委员会模式应当作为我国医疗纠纷解决机制当中非常重要的组成部分。As one of the ways in alternative dispute resolution, mediation is supposed to play a positive role in medical disputes. At present, there are three medical dispute mediation modes in China. Compared with court mediation mode and administrative mediation mode, people＇s conciliation committee mode, which falls into civil mediation category, has greater advantages in terms of specialty, neutrality, credibility, accessibility and effective- ness. Therefore, it should be the major component of medical dispute resolution mechanism in China.

关 键 词：医疗纠纷 调解模式 人民调解委员会 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]